Castings (except die-castings), unfinished, aluminum, manufacturing · Michigan

Dicastal North America

Greenville, MI · ~371 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dicastal North America runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Castings (except die-castings), unfinished, aluminum, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Dicastal North America: 5.0 TCR = 151% of Castings (except die-castings), unfinished, aluminum, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dicastal North America safety composite

Dicastal North America scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dicastal North America: 5.0 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2024

Dicastal North America's TCR rose 1.5 from 5.0 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331524 · Greenville, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 151% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #3/12
  • PHOTO Enkei America Columbus
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 140 inj
  • SIZE ~371 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Enkei America Columbus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Dicastal North America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dicastal North America averages 5.0 TCR (151% of the Castings (except die-castings), unfinished, aluminum, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dicastal North America TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=3.3 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Dicastal North America falls in its industry

156 Castings (except die-castings) establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 12 Castings (except die-castings) employers in Michigan.

Dicastal North America (371 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dicastal North America
Dicastal North America (371 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 7.0

Dicastal North America has more employees than the Castings (except die-castings), unfinish median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 6.1 32 0 0
2023 2.4 1.1 18 0 0
2022 7.2 5.2 30 2 0
2019 3.3 2.1 16 1 0
2018 6.1 4.4 22 4 0
2017 4.5 3.5 17 0 0
2016 5.0 1.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331524 · MI · Greenville

156 Castings (except die-castings), unfinished, aluminum, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 49 employers in Greenville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Enkei America Columbus 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Oxford Aluminum 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Foundry Service Corporation 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAPT 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Inalfa Roof Systems 371 FTE
STATE-SIZE DC85 371 FTE
STATE-SIZE Magna 30020 371 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alpine Power Systems 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHUM UNITED MEMORIAL CA 642 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spectrum Health United Memorial 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR 201 - Greenville 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer201 305 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlas Metal Works, LLC 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cosmo Cabinets LLC 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR horizon drywall inc 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 4002 - CQ North West 10t 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sanko Gosei Technologies USA 371 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMA Plastics Corp 371 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - BWI1 371 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mann+Hummel USA,INC. Plant 3 371 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.