Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Michigan

Dickinson County Healthcare System

Iron Mountain, MI · ~461 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dickinson County Healthcare System runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade D.

Dickinson County Healthcare System: 9.2 TCR = 123% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dickinson County Healthcare System safety composite

Dickinson County Healthcare System scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dickinson County Healthcare System: 5.9 → 7.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 6056.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.07× in 2021

Dickinson County Healthcare System's TCR rose 2.0 from 5.9 in 2017 to 7.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6056.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Iron Mountain, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.2 · 123% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #236/262
  • PHOTO 6403-64030371
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 140 inj
  • SIZE ~461 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6403-64030371 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Dickinson County Healthcare System in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dickinson County Healthcare System averages 9.2 TCR (123% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dickinson County Healthcare System TCR series: 2017=5.9 · 2018=6056 · 2019=10.6 · 2020=12.3 · 2021=7.9 · BLS 7.5

Where Dickinson County Healthcare System falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #236 safest of 262 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Michigan.

Dickinson County Healthcare System (461 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dickinson County Healthcare System
Dickinson County Healthcare System (461 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Dickinson County Healthcare System has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.9 0.7 32 17 0
2020 12.3 1.1 31 34 0
2019 10.6 0.8 31 26 0
2018 6056.0 302.8 28 12 0
2017 5.9 1.8 18 22 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MI · Iron Mountain

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 30 employers in Iron Mountain, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6403-64030371 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SH - Building E 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint Joseph's Hospital - EHC 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR St Mary's Medical Center 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE IAC Group - Alma Plant 461 FTE
STATE-SIZE Child & Family Serv 461 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Building 461 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maintenance/Transportation/CIC/Consultation Serv. 461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Division 1,564 FTE
CITY-NEAR Systems Control 697 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCI Systems 665 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2434 383 FTE
NAT-TCR 1008 - Spartanburg Sc Whse 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4765-LS2PW9668 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Chem-Tainer - Cranston 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Txckl - Chalk Hill - Hib 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cornejo & Sons, LLC 461 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otis Eastern Service, LLC 461 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supply Chain : Peebles, OH 461 FTE
NAT-SIZE NYSEG Kirckwood JACC 461 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.