Accumulators, industrial pressure vessels, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · Texas

Dickson Process Systems, LLC

Midland, TX · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dickson Process Systems, LLC runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Accumulators, industrial pressure vessels, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Dickson Process Systems, LLC: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Accumulators, industrial pressure vessels, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dickson Process Systems, LLC safety composite

Dickson Process Systems, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2017→2024

Dickson Process Systems, LLC injury rate improved

Dickson Process Systems, LLC's TCR fell 6.4 from 9.5 in 2017 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332420 · Midland, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/64
  • PHOTO Curtis Kelly
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Curtis Kelly (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Dickson Process Systems, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dickson Process Systems, LLC averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Accumulators, industrial pressure vessels, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dickson Process Systems, LLC TCR series: 2017=9.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Dickson Process Systems, LLC falls in its industry

355 Accumulators, industrial press establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 64 Accumulators, industrial press employers in Texas.

Dickson Process Systems, LLC (38 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dickson Process Systems, LLC
Dickson Process Systems, LLC (38 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Dickson Process Systems, LLC has fewer employees than the Accumulators, industrial pressure vessel median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 9.5 4.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332420 · TX · Midland

355 Accumulators, industrial pressure vessels, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 359 employers in Midland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Curtis Kelly 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Counts Container Corp 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westerman, Inc. - Wooster 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Products RPC 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE PILGRIMS MT. PLEASANT BREEDER AND BROILER 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Agricultural- Danevang 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2362/3714-Lubbock, TX-R&D (Monsanto Co.) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX Midland 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Memorial Hospital 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Jobsites 1,716 FTE
CITY-NEAR ProPetro Services, Inc. 1,666 FTE
NAT-TCR Nanticoke Health Services 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Delaney Park Health and Rehabilitation Center 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Environmental Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Butera market 503 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE General Filters 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield Industries, LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Material Company 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amerect, Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.