Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing · Ohio

Die-Matic Corporation

Brooklyn Heights, OH · ~100 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Die-Matic Corporation runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Die-Matic Corporation: 7.0 TCR = 212% of Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Die-Matic Corporation safety composite

Die-Matic Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2024

Die-Matic Corporation injury rate improved

Die-Matic Corporation's TCR fell 1.5 from 5.7 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.7 · 2017=7.7 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=2.3 · 2022=11.1 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Brooklyn Heights, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 212% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #53/70
  • PHOTO Kenmode - All Facili…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kenmode - All Facilities (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Die-Matic Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Die-Matic Corporation averages 7.0 TCR (212% of the Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Die-Matic Corporation TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2017=7.7 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=8 · 2020=2.3 · 2022=11.1 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Die-Matic Corporation falls in its industry

477 Stampings (except automotive, establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 70 Stampings (except automotive, employers in Ohio.

Die-Matic Corporation (100 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Die-Matic Corporation
Die-Matic Corporation (100 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Die-Matic Corporation has more employees than the Stampings (except automotive, cans, coin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 0.0 4 0 0
2023 6.8 1.0 6 1 0
2022 11.1 6.0 11 0 0
2020 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2019 8.0 4.8 10 0 0
2018 9.9 7.4 12 0 0
2017 7.7 1.7 4 5 0
2016 5.7 3.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · OH · Brooklyn Heights

477 Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 29 employers in Brooklyn Heights, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kenmode - All Facilities 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Metal Fab, LLC 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AK Stamping Co, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manitowoc Tool & Manufacturing, LLC 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NORTHEASTERN - NORTHEAST SHOP 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE All Locations 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miles-McClellan Construction Company, Inc. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Precision Pipeline Services 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Visiting Nurse Association of Cleveland 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLEVELAND OH - 085 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Paving & Construction Co., Inc. 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Headquarters and Electrode Technology Center 69 FTE
NAT-TCR Auburn Plant 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Springdale Heating & Air 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bloomington Plant 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EMPNC, Inc 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brandon Hyundai 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Honda of Ocala 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fountain CO Truss 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Myojo U.S.A., Inc. 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.