Other Building Equipment Contractors · Ohio

Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services

North Canton, OH · ~470 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other Building Equipment Contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services: 0.9 TCR = 33% of Other Building Equipment Contractors BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services safety composite

Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services: 0.7 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2024

Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services's TCR rose 0.4 from 0.7 in 2023 to 1.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · North Canton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #11/58
  • PHOTO Otis Elevator Compan…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~470 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Otis Elevator Company-North Jersey (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services averages 0.9 TCR (33% of the Other Building Equipment Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services TCR series: 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services falls in its industry

1,138 Other Building Equipment Contr establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 58 Other Building Equipment Contr employers in Ohio.

Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services (470 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services
Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services (470 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services has more employees than the Other Building Equipment Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.4 9 0 0
2023 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · OH · North Canton

1,138 Other Building Equipment Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 142 employers in North Canton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-North Jersey 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR D89 San Diego 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elcon 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 510 - Austin 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cenovus Energy Lima Refining Company 470 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kao USA 470 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baker Gulf Coast Industrial, LLC 471 FTE
STATE-SIZE Archbold OH 469 FTE
CITY-NEAR TestAmerica Laboratories Inc 1,822 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Canton HQ 1,230 FTE
CITY-NEAR Absolute Rehabilitation and Consulting Services Inc 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Absolute Rehabilitation & Consulting Services, Inc. 451 FTE
NAT-TCR Hnl Daniel K. Inouye International 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR General Machine Products (KT) LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Canyon Springs Enterprises 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Solutia Inc., Indian Orchard MA 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tunxis Community College 470 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smoky Mountain Family Farms LLC - Newport TN Farm 470 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smoky Mountain Family Farms LLC - Midway TN Farm 470 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valero Refining Company - Texas City 470 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.