Other Building Equipment Contractors · California

Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA

Pleasanton, CA · ~119 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Other Building Equipment Contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA: 4.2 TCR = 149% of Other Building Equipment Contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA safety composite

Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2019→2024

Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA injury rate improved

Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA's TCR fell 2.5 from 4.0 in 2019 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.0 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Pleasanton, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 149% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #69/85
  • PHOTO L & S Insulation
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: L & S Insulation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA averages 4.2 TCR (149% of the Other Building Equipment Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA TCR series: 2019=4 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA falls in its industry

1,138 Other Building Equipment Contr establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 85 Other Building Equipment Contr employers in California.

Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA (119 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA
Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA (119 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Diebold Nixdorf Pleasanton CA has more employees than the Other Building Equipment Contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 0.6 5 0 0
2023 3.5 3.0 7 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2021 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2020 10.4 0.0 3 0 0
2019 4.0 4.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · CA · Pleasanton

1,138 Other Building Equipment Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 169 employers in Pleasanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR L & S Insulation 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CP&E Cortland 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NPSG Global 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DH Pace Company Inc dba King Door 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fresh Prep, LLC 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE HM Clause - Cousteau 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Booth Ranches LLC 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pyramid Flowers 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 138 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 624 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasanton Campus 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sciens Building Solutions LLC 1,472 FTE
NAT-TCR 1681 Corporate Dr Mckinney Tx 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Moxy Boston 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Coastal Health and Rehabilitation Center 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Marc Glassman Inc 71BL 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE BrandSafway Services LLC - BP Cherry Pt. Refinery 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE ADESA Charlotte 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Appelt 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Sioux Falls 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.