Luncheon meat (except poultry) made from purchased carcasses · Pennsylvania

Dietz and Watson

Philadelphia, PA · ~1,341 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dietz and Watson runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Luncheon meat (except poultry) made from purchased carcasses workplace, earning a grade F.

Dietz and Watson: 6.6 TCR = 201% of Luncheon meat (except poultry) made from purchased carcasses BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dietz and Watson safety composite

Dietz and Watson scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2024

Dietz and Watson injury rate improved

Dietz and Watson's TCR fell 4.6 from 8.2 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.2 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=8.0 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=6.6 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 201% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #22/37
  • PHOTO Bobak Sausage Company
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 624 inj
  • SIZE ~1,341 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bobak Sausage Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Dietz and Watson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dietz and Watson averages 6.6 TCR (201% of the Luncheon meat (except poultry) made from purchased carcasses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dietz and Watson TCR series: 2016=8.2 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=8 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=6.6 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Dietz and Watson falls in its industry

613 Luncheon meat (except poultry) establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 37 Luncheon meat (except poultry) employers in Pennsylvania.

Dietz and Watson (1,341 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dietz and Watson
Dietz and Watson (1,341 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Dietz and Watson has more employees than the Luncheon meat (except poultry) made from median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.4 49 0 0
2023 6.6 6.3 87 0 0
2022 5.7 5.1 76 0 0
2021 8.0 7.2 97 0 0
2020 6.3 5.9 75 0 0
2019 6.9 4.3 76 1 0
2018 7.6 6.5 82 1 0
2016 8.2 7.2 82 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · PA · Philadelphia

613 Luncheon meat (except poultry) made from purchased carcasses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bobak Sausage Company 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality Sausage Company LLC 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Economy Locker Storage Co., Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premio Foods Inc. Brooksville 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE LAFAYETTE COLLEGE 1,338 FTE
STATE-SIZE York Vehicle Operations 1,345 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cleveland Brothers Equipment Company 1,333 FTE
STATE-SIZE AK Steel - Butler Works 1,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Ace Hardware Waukegan North 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vulcan Industries Corporation 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Willamalane Park and Swim Center 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 40HWY 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Memphis - 5155 Lamar Avenue 1,341 FTE
NAT-SIZE Township Building Services, Inc. 1,341 FTE
NAT-SIZE MTD Consumer Group Martin 1,341 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hopewell 1,341 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.