Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing · Arizona

Digital Building Components

Phoenix, AZ · ~148 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Digital Building Components runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Digital Building Components: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Digital Building Components safety composite

Digital Building Components scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2018→2024

Digital Building Components injury rate improved

Digital Building Components's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332311 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO Pacific Metal co.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~148 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pacific Metal co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Digital Building Components in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Digital Building Components averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Digital Building Components TCR series: 2018=2 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Digital Building Components falls in its industry

393 Buildings, prefabricated metal establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Buildings, prefabricated metal employers in Arizona.

Digital Building Components (148 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Digital Building Components
Digital Building Components (148 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Digital Building Components has more employees than the Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332311 · AZ · Phoenix

393 Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pacific Metal co. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HUNTER BUILDINGS & MANUFACTURING, LP 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Building Systems Terrell 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Insulated Panel Group 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brothers Harvesting Inc 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meritage Homes of Texas - San Antonio Division 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olympic West Fire Protection, LLC 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrews Refrigeration Inc 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Equix Energy Services, LLS - JACKSONVILLE 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Supported Independence Srvc of or - 1131 Calvin 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Midland 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dresser-Rand Los Angeles Service Center 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE RVI-Forest 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Donaldson Company - Greeneville, TN 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cadillac Uniform and Linen Supply 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Distribution & Contracting, Inc 148 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.