Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Alaska

Dine College FDS

Anchorage, AK · ~22 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dine College FDS runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade C.

Dine College FDS: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dine College FDS safety composite

Dine College FDS scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Dine College FDS held a steady TCR band

Dine College FDS's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Anchorage, AK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/29
  • PHOTO Barclay's Whippany
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barclay's Whippany (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

Dine College FDS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dine College FDS averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dine College FDS TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Dine College FDS falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 29 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Alaska.

Dine College FDS (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dine College FDS
Dine College FDS (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Dine College FDS has fewer employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · AK · Anchorage

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 704 employers in Anchorage, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barclay's Whippany 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOREHOUSE COLLEGE 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT BLOOMBERG 731 LEX PANTRY 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT GRAMBLING RESIDENT DINING 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dept. of Natural Resources (24) 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dept. of Natural Resources (27) 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Point Construction, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Street Services 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000198 4,453 FTE
CITY-NEAR AK10 PROVIDENCE ALASKA MEDICAL CTR-ANCHORAGE 2,864 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alaska Native Medical Center 2,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR GCI Communication Corp. 1,935 FTE
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE TRG a Division of Alter Trading Rogers 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Corrugated Logistics), LLC 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE LANI-Brownwood 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ernest Peterson, Incorporated 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.