Cartridge toner merchant wholesalers · Texas

Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES

Dallas, TX · ~91 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES runs at 480% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cartridge toner merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES: 10.6 TCR = 480% of Cartridge toner merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES safety composite

Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES: 10.7 → 14.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2024

Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES's TCR rose 3.5 from 10.7 in 2022 to 14.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424120 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 480% of ind

  • DART 9.5 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Clover Imaging Group…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clover Imaging Group LLC - Calexico, CA (0.8 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES averages 10.6 TCR (480% of the Cartridge toner merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES TCR series: 2022=10.7 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=14.2 · BLS 2.2

Where Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES falls in its industry

87 Cartridge toner merchant whole establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Cartridge toner merchant whole employers in Texas.

Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES (91 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES
Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES (91 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Distribution Management Inc. DC-MES has more employees than the Cartridge toner merchant wholesalers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.2 9.5 12 0 0
2023 6.8 5.4 5 0 0
2022 10.7 7.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424120 · TX · Dallas

87 Cartridge toner merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clover Imaging Group LLC - Calexico, CA 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clover Environmental Solutions LLC - Calexico, CA 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SP Richards Co Phoenix 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MSE Technologies, LLC 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE South Texas Oilfield Solutions, LLC 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quadvest LP 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - North Central Texas 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leyendecker Builders & Contractors, Inc. 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Gaudenzia DRC 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Logistics OR LLC 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cresco Building Service Inc 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeastern Michigan Rehabilitation and Opportunity Center (Ripley) 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dajcor Aluminum Inc. 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Estates of Evanston 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE QCD Hawaii 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Location 15022 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.