Building cleaning services, interior · Hawaii

District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance

Honolulu, HI · ~39 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Building cleaning services, interior workplace, earning a grade C.

District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance: 3.9 TCR = 88% of Building cleaning services, interior BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance safety composite

District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.9

2016→2018

District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance injury rate improved

District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance's TCR fell 7.9 from 7.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.9 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Honolulu, HI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/19
  • PHOTO Township-United Buil…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Township-United Building Services, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Hawaii employers → · Look up another →

District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance averages 3.9 TCR (88% of the Building cleaning services, interior BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance TCR series: 2016=7.9 · 2018=0 · BLS 4.5

Where District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, in establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Hawaii alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 19 Building cleaning services, in employers in Hawaii.

District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance (39 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance
District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance (39 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

District 1 - Section 4/Hanauma Bay Maintenance has fewer employees than the Building cleaning services, interior median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.9 7.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · HI · Honolulu

4,064 Building cleaning services, interior employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,022 rated employers in Hawaii with headcount on file · 796 employers in Honolulu, HI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Township-United Building Services, LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BBB 15940 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LVH-Hecktown Oaks 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMS 1585 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waialua Fresh 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE County of Maui Department of Water Supply - Kalana O' Maui Building -5th Floor 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE McClone Construction-HI 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wasa Electrical Services, Inc. HAWAII 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9095-HNL 5,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR HNL HONOLULUL 4,589 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawaiian Airlines - HNL 4,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12812007 MOANALUA MEDICAL OFFICES 2,355 FTE
NAT-TCR US - Supply Chain : 0003 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CC004 - New Mexico-Main Office 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MS - Fprt Leonard Wood, MO - 1FLMO 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillcrest Care Center Inc 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE HBSHSEMD26 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE HBSHSEIN30 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Lake Tube LLC 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russ Darrow LLC 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.