Commercial printing (except screen, books) · Georgia

Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant

Duluth, GA · ~42 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial printing (except screen, books) workplace, earning a grade D.

Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant: 5.2 TCR = 158% of Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant safety composite

Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant held a steady TCR band

Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 5.2 in 2023 to 5.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=5.2 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Duluth, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 158% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #47/51
  • PHOTO Elite4Print
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elite4Print (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant averages 5.2 TCR (158% of the Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant TCR series: 2023=5.2 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial printing (except sc establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 51 Commercial printing (except sc employers in Georgia.

Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant (42 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant
Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant (42 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Diversified Labeling Solutions- Atlanta GA Plant has fewer employees than the Commercial printing (except screen, book median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2023 5.2 5.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · GA · Duluth

2,001 Commercial printing (except screen, books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 203 employers in Duluth, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elite4Print 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MARTINSBURG WV - ANNEX 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR THE ROARK GROUP 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sashay Corporate Services, LLC 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlas Manufacturing, Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fieldale Farms - Pullet/Breeder Facility 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Bushnell, FL 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fieldale Farms - Lavonia Hatchery 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside Duluth 1,352 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boehringer Ingelheim Duluth 1,327 FTE
CITY-NEAR BI Vet Medica 1,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR 123569-NORTH METRO GA P&DC 1,103 FTE
NAT-TCR Rosauers Supermarkets, Inc. #3 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Salina Regional Health Center 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Crow Wing County 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 280 Capitol Heights 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midway 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spinal Technology, LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cranberry 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Endur Contractors, LLC 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.