General warehousing and storage · California

Dixon, CA - Renal Distr.

Dixon, CA · ~26 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dixon, CA - Renal Distr. runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade D.

Dixon, CA - Renal Distr.: 7.2 TCR = 124% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dixon, CA - Renal Distr. safety composite

Dixon, CA - Renal Distr. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.2

2016→2020

Dixon, CA - Renal Distr. injury rate improved

Dixon, CA - Renal Distr.'s TCR fell 12.2 from 12.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.2 · 2017=12.2 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Dixon, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 124% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #847/1131
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - DET2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Dixon, CA - Renal Distr. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dixon, CA - Renal Distr. averages 7.2 TCR (124% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dixon, CA - Renal Distr. TCR series: 2016=12.2 · 2017=12.2 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Dixon, CA - Renal Distr. falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #847 safest of 1131 General warehousing and storag employers in California.

Dixon, CA - Renal Distr. (26 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dixon, CA - Renal Distr.
Dixon, CA - Renal Distr. (26 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Dixon, CA - Renal Distr. has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2018 8.2 4.1 2 0 0
2017 12.2 12.2 3 0 0
2016 12.2 12.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Dixon

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 64 employers in Dixon, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DET2 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linden Distribution Center 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ABE2 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR HealthTrust Supply Chain Jacksonville Warehouse 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE HAULING & TRAILER SHOP 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seasholtz Co., LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Valley Vineyards 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Central Coast Vineyards 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 174 2,579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayoral Brothers Incoporated Farm Labor Contractor 375 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5139 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5139 300 FTE
NAT-TCR Mercy Health St Anne Hospital 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Ft. Pierce, FL 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Holland Mgmt - RC1 Dover 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Augusto, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE WASCO 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village Works 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutherlands Home Base - Amarillo 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kasson-Mantorville ISD#204 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.