Building cleaning services, janitorial · Arizona

DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ

Phoenix, AZ · ~57 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade C.

DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ: 3.7 TCR = 82% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ safety composite

DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ held a steady TCR band

DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=11.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #35/69
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT HENRY MAYO…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEM HOSP ES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ averages 3.7 TCR (82% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=11.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 69 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Arizona.

DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ (57 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ
DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ (57 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

DMS Facility Services - Engineering/AZ has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 11.1 5.5 1 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · AZ · Phoenix

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEM HOSP ES 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR State Environmental Services, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR UCHealth Memorial Hospital North - EVS 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR University of New Mexico Cancer Center - EVS 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Metro Water District 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Mountain Construcgtion 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Juarez contracting 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE VSS International, Inc. Arizona Construction 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Downtown LA 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Metko, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR REHAU Construction 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR AS-Keiper Eldon-12554 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE OG&E-Muskogee Service Center 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Auburn, IN 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alcala Logistics, LLC 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weldwerks Brewing 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.