Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming · Nebraska

DNA Transport

Columbus, NE · ~65 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DNA Transport runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming workplace, earning a grade B.

DNA Transport: 2.4 TCR = 53% of Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DNA Transport safety composite

DNA Transport scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DNA Transport: 0.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

DNA Transport's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112210 · Columbus, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/42
  • PHOTO Indian Creek
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Indian Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

DNA Transport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DNA Transport averages 2.4 TCR (53% of the Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DNA Transport TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where DNA Transport falls in its industry

280 Hog and pig (including breedin establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 42 Hog and pig (including breedin employers in Nebraska.

DNA Transport (65 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 7.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DNA Transport
DNA Transport (65 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 7.7

DNA Transport has more employees than the Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2019 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2017 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112210 · NE · Columbus

280 Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 91 employers in Columbus, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Indian Creek 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR VALLEY VIEW #2 - 10, 14-16, 18-19 -EST 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TUMBLEWEED SOW FARM -EST 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LNM - 102 -EST 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Double Dutch Dairy LLC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE GJW, LLC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kamterter Products, LLC. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGC Group Inc 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Columbus West 1,148 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Pharmaceutical Systems 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Community Hospital 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Columbus East 762 FTE
NAT-TCR 1333 - Billings Heights 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Chopper #002 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookfield Operations, LLC dba The Courtyards at Claremore Assisted Living Memory Care 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Construction 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arjobex America, Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salem Waterfront Hotel 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE B94 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3272 - Rogers Park 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.