Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Alabama

Dollar General (WC USX DGB)

Bessemer, AL · ~28 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dollar General (WC USX DGB) runs at 342% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Dollar General (WC USX DGB): 15.4 TCR = 342% of Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dollar General (WC USX DGB) safety composite

Dollar General (WC USX DGB) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−33.2

2016→2019

Dollar General (WC USX DGB) injury rate improved

Dollar General (WC USX DGB)'s TCR fell 33.2 from 33.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 33.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=33.2 · 2017=14.6 · 2018=13.8 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Bessemer, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 342% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #86/90
  • PHOTO Crete, NE
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crete, NE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Dollar General (WC USX DGB) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dollar General (WC USX DGB) averages 15.4 TCR (342% of the Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dollar General (WC USX DGB) TCR series: 2016=33.2 · 2017=14.6 · 2018=13.8 · 2019=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Dollar General (WC USX DGB) falls in its industry

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 90 Motor freight carrier, general employers in Alabama.

Dollar General (WC USX DGB) (28 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dollar General (WC USX DGB)
Dollar General (WC USX DGB) (28 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Dollar General (WC USX DGB) has fewer employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, long-dis median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 13.8 13.8 6 0 0
2017 14.6 14.6 10 0 0
2016 33.2 29.9 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · AL · Bessemer

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 116 employers in Bessemer, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crete, NE 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 320982 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WA-Ridgefield-Dollar Tree 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maverick Transportation, LLC - Birmingham, AL 15.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hillabee Plant 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillabee 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Division Headland Office 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE W.K. Upchurch Construction Co., Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BHM1 4,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bessemer, DC 768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blox LLC 581 FTE
CITY-NEAR US PIPE - BHM-DIP 559 FTE
NAT-TCR The Atrium at Serenity Pointe 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CLARO / PRT - Modulos Humacao y CO 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Creekside Inn 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR KCN Cook County 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Office 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Systems Plant Services, Inc.- Crawfordsville, IN Nucor 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Systems Plant Services, Inc.- Convent, LA Nucor 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE PacLease Hickory Hills 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.