Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Georgia

Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA)

Savannah, GA · ~104 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA) runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA): 10.3 TCR = 228% of Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA) safety composite

Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 7% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

5/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2021

Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA) injury rate improved

Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA)'s TCR fell 2.0 from 11.5 in 2016 to 9.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 423.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.5 · 2017=6.0 · 2018=10.5 · 2019=423.1 · 2020=13.9 · 2021=9.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Savannah, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 228% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #160/166
  • PHOTO HAROLD DAVID STORY, …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 82 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HAROLD DAVID STORY, INC. DBA CEDAR CREEK TRUCKING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA) averages 10.3 TCR (228% of the Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA) TCR series: 2016=11.5 · 2017=6 · 2018=10.5 · 2019=423.1 · 2020=13.9 · 2021=9.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA) falls in its industry

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #160 safest of 166 Motor freight carrier, general employers in Georgia.

Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA) (104 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA)
Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA) (104 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Dollar Tree (WC USX DGA) has more employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, long-dis median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.5 8.1 7 0 0
2020 13.9 13.1 17 0 0
2019 423.1 423.1 11 0 0
2018 10.5 8.6 11 0 1
2017 6.0 5.5 11 0 0
2016 11.5 10.1 25 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · GA · Savannah

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 511 employers in Savannah, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HAROLD DAVID STORY, INC. DBA CEDAR CREEK TRUCKING 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FAS TUL 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ASP Inc of South Dakota 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR S & S Transport Inc 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE EC Electric Inc 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Polk County Public Service, Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodman Insulation Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&D Concrete Cutting, Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulfstream Aerospace 13,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical Center 3,186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savannah College of Art and Design 2,369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical 2,056 FTE
NAT-TCR Spring Hill Health and Rehab 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal Park Health & Rehab 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bedrock Flint Inc. 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodbriar Place 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Retama Manor Nursing Center/Laredo West 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suffolk Construction Co 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Services (past E&I) 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cambridge East Healthcare Center 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.