Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Kentucky

Dominion Senior Living of Richmond

Richmond, KY · ~31 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dominion Senior Living of Richmond runs at 396% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Dominion Senior Living of Richmond: 15.1 TCR = 396% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dominion Senior Living of Richmond safety composite

Dominion Senior Living of Richmond scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 42.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dominion Senior Living of Richmond: 0.0 → 42.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 42.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2.83× in 2020

Dominion Senior Living of Richmond's TCR rose 42.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 42.6 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Richmond, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.1 · 396% of ind

  • DART 42.6 DART
  • RANK #51/56
  • PHOTO Church of God Home
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Church of God Home (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Dominion Senior Living of Richmond in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dominion Senior Living of Richmond averages 15.1 TCR (396% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dominion Senior Living of Richmond TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=13.1 · 2020=42.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Dominion Senior Living of Richmond falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 56 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Kentucky.

Dominion Senior Living of Richmond (31 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dominion Senior Living of Richmond
Dominion Senior Living of Richmond (31 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Dominion Senior Living of Richmond has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 42.6 42.6 2 11 0
2019 13.1 9.8 4 0 0
2018 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · KY · Richmond

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 100 employers in Richmond, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Church of God Home 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Danville 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AC-KNUTE-AUTUMN COTTAGES 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Peoria 1 15.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hwy 64 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Sandy 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Carlisle 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Geothermal Earthworks Inc 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Grass Chem. Demil. 947 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Richmond 641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Heath Richmond 604 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chem Demil US KY Richmond KY KY997 539 FTE
NAT-TCR Faribault Ofc/Whse 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Deaf Residential Services 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR EIW 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Regional Logistics Support Center- Austin 15.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Construction Austin 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE 09YS 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joseph Companies (IQHC) 2395 W Washington 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morningside of Springdale 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.