Natural gas pipeline construction · Ohio

Don Wartko Construction, Inc.

Kent, OH · ~109 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Don Wartko Construction, Inc. runs at 185% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Natural gas pipeline construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Don Wartko Construction, Inc.: 5.2 TCR = 185% of Natural gas pipeline construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Don Wartko Construction, Inc. safety composite

Don Wartko Construction, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2018→2024

Don Wartko Construction, Inc. injury rate improved

Don Wartko Construction, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.8 from 9.2 in 2018 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.2 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Kent, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 185% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #32/32
  • PHOTO PCI Utilities, LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PCI Utilities, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Don Wartko Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Don Wartko Construction, Inc. averages 5.2 TCR (185% of the Natural gas pipeline construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Don Wartko Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2018=9.2 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Don Wartko Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

809 Natural gas pipeline construct establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 32 Natural gas pipeline construct employers in Ohio.

Don Wartko Construction, Inc. (109 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Don Wartko Construction, Inc.
Don Wartko Construction, Inc. (109 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Don Wartko Construction, Inc. has fewer employees than the Natural gas pipeline construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 2.0 5 0 0
2023 3.2 0.6 5 0 0
2022 2.4 0.0 3 0 0
2021 3.6 2.7 4 0 0
2020 5.9 3.0 6 0 0
2019 8.4 5.6 9 0 0
2018 9.2 6.1 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · OH · Kent

809 Natural gas pipeline construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 188 employers in Kent, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PCI Utilities, LLC 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR KS Energy Services (Northern Ohio) 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR EXCEL Contractors @ KP Kelco 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Little Big Inch Pipeline 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE GEM Industrial Inc - Ardagh/Project Bluewave 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE All-Temp Refrigeration Inc 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE TFH-EB Inc. dba The Waterworks 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mane Inc. Woodlawn Production 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARTER LUMBER CORPORATE OFFICE 600 786 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3722 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3722 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR Podnar Plastics, Inc. 324 FTE
NAT-TCR Perfection Group, Inc., Indianapolis 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Country Dairy 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Witness Inspection 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR TEAM Cambridge, Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Farm and Fleet of Morton 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norwich Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Custom Built, Inc. 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barksdale 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.