Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building · Georgia

Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc.

Oakwood, GA · ~37 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc. safety composite

Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Oakwood, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/121
  • PHOTO Tripp Enterprises Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tripp Enterprises Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 121 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Georgia.

Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc. (37 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc.
Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc. (37 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Dooley and Mack Constructors of Georgia, Inc. has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, com median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · GA · Oakwood

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 36 employers in Oakwood, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tripp Enterprises Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison Construction 2016 OSHA 300 & 300A 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tepcon Construction Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Houston 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4769-626-WILLIAMS SONOMA 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penske : 5482-00 GAF-DCC/Statesboro, GA 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camilla Feedmill 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE AtlantaNorth 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Performance Atlanta - 0705 782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foodservice Atlanta - 0705 757 FTE
CITY-NEAR Performance Milton's - 0705 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3627 362 FTE
NAT-TCR Westell Inc Aurora 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pitman Glass Company 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EPIC Tampa 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE OmniSource, LLC. - Vicksburg 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE OmniSource, LLC. - Lima 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Theodore AL Truss 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springhill Suites 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.