Concrete paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) · Pennsylvania

Doug Lamb Construction Inc

Elizabethtown, PA · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Doug Lamb Construction Inc runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Concrete paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) workplace, earning a grade D.

Doug Lamb Construction Inc: 4.7 TCR = 169% of Concrete paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Doug Lamb Construction Inc safety composite

Doug Lamb Construction Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2024

Doug Lamb Construction Inc injury rate improved

Doug Lamb Construction Inc's TCR fell 0.5 from 4.9 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=9.0 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Elizabethtown, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 169% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #130/196
  • PHOTO Glenn Thurman, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Glenn Thurman, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Doug Lamb Construction Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Doug Lamb Construction Inc averages 4.7 TCR (169% of the Concrete paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Doug Lamb Construction Inc TCR series: 2017=4.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=9 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Doug Lamb Construction Inc falls in its industry

4,078 Concrete paving (i.e., highway establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #130 safest of 196 Concrete paving (i.e., highway employers in Pennsylvania.

Doug Lamb Construction Inc (32 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Doug Lamb Construction Inc
Doug Lamb Construction Inc (32 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Doug Lamb Construction Inc has fewer employees than the Concrete paving (i.e., highway, road, st median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 9.0 0.0 2 0 0
2021 10.2 10.2 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.9 4.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · PA · Elizabethtown

4,078 Concrete paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 47 employers in Elizabethtown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Glenn Thurman, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SealPros Inc 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peek Pavement Marking Cleveland, GA 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Motor Carriers 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE KNOUSE FRUITLANDS, INC. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paramount Mushroom Farms LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wharf 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAJ Mushroom 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masonic Villages at Elizabethtown 1,879 FTE
CITY-NEAR ELZ 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8010130 Mars Snackfood Elizabethtown 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DPH7 248 FTE
NAT-TCR Burggraf's Ace Hardware & Paint Co 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Alliedbean Demolition 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NOC Surgery Center 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Island Park-Ny59 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arauco North America - Biscoe 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Infrastructure, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE James Construction Group LLC -Miller Springs 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.