Elementary and secondary schools · Oregon

Douglas Country School District #4 District Office

Roseburg, OR · ~146 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Douglas Country School District #4 District Office runs at 224% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Elementary and secondary schools workplace, earning a grade F.

Douglas Country School District #4 District Office: 3.1 TCR = 224% of Elementary and secondary schools BLS 1.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Douglas Country School District #4 District Office safety composite

Douglas Country School District #4 District Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Douglas Country School District #4 District Office: 3.4 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2018

Douglas Country School District #4 District Office's TCR rose 1.0 from 3.4 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Roseburg, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.1 · 224% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #75/185
  • PHOTO Wolfe County Head St…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~146 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wolfe County Head Start (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Douglas Country School District #4 District Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Douglas Country School District #4 District Office averages 3.1 TCR (224% of the Elementary and secondary schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Douglas Country School District #4 District Office TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=4.4 · BLS 1.4

Where Douglas Country School District #4 District Office falls in its industry

3,374 Elementary and secondary schoo establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 185 Elementary and secondary schoo employers in Oregon.

Douglas Country School District #4 District Office (146 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Douglas Country School District #4 District Office
Douglas Country School District #4 District Office (146 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Douglas Country School District #4 District Office has more employees than the Elementary and secondary schools median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.4 2.2 4 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2016 3.4 3.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · OR · Roseburg

3,374 Elementary and secondary schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 125 employers in Roseburg, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wolfe County Head Start 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Timberland Transportation 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Andersen 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bethune 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Portland Mechanical Contractors 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Signature Graphics, Inc. 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alpine Food Distributing, Inc 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1108 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Outpatient Lab 5,503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foundation, Community Education, Healthy Kids 1,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine Lab - Mercy Laboratory 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine - Mercy Imaging 1,022 FTE
NAT-TCR Northwest Community Healthcare Medical Group at 1450 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Yarmouth (Mayar) 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR HRA BatesYouth 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Okc #97 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Wk Sh 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Semco Assembly Plant 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cordelia Center (Cacor) 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Murfreesboro (Tnmur) 146 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.