Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) · Oregon

Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol

Roseburg, OR · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol runs at 363% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) workplace, earning a grade F.

Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol: 11.6 TCR = 363% of Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol safety composite

Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 11.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol: 8.9 → 14.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.31× in 2024

Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol's TCR rose 5.3 from 8.9 in 2023 to 14.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922120 · Roseburg, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 363% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #12/27
  • PHOTO Police Department
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Police Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol averages 11.6 TCR (363% of the Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol TCR series: 2023=8.9 · 2024=14.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol falls in its industry

716 Sheriffs' offices (except cour establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 27 Sheriffs' offices (except cour employers in Oregon.

Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol (57 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol
Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol (57 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5

Douglas County Sheriff Office - Patrol has fewer employees than the Sheriffs' offices (except court function median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.3 3.6 8 0 0
2023 8.9 1.8 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922120 · OR · Roseburg

716 Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 125 employers in Roseburg, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Police Department 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Public Safety (40) 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Police Department 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheriff's Office 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kuenzi Turf & Nursery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE R&R King Logging Inc 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pavilion Construction NW 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Northwest Gutters 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Outpatient Lab 5,503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foundation, Community Education, Healthy Kids 1,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine Lab - Mercy Laboratory 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine - Mercy Imaging 1,022 FTE
NAT-TCR Geneship LLC 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kason Corporation 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Manhattan Day Hab 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Coegl - Englewood Center 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Safe Berks 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kempf King of Prussia 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE S.J. Distributors LLC-Gilroy Warehouse 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Exacta Laboratory Systems, LLC 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.