Single-family house construction by general contractors · North Carolina

D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville

Asheville, NC · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Single-family house construction by general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville: 0.7 TCR = 18% of Single-family house construction by general contractors BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville safety composite

D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville held a steady TCR band

D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Asheville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/20
  • PHOTO Ironwood Homes, inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ironwood Homes, inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville averages 0.7 TCR (18% of the Single-family house construction by general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville falls in its industry

976 Single-family house constructi establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 20 Single-family house constructi employers in North Carolina.

D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville (33 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville
D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville (33 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

D.R. Horton, Inc. - Asheville has fewer employees than the Single-family house construction by gene median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · NC · Asheville

976 Single-family house construction by general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ironwood Homes, inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LiveGreen, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston Division 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR FIP construction, Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Scott Brothers Inc 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strickland Farms Payroll 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE James B. Morris Farms, Inc, 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE LTL, LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR R.C. Page Construction, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Utility Group 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Henderson Services, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR New Jersey Mental Health Association 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clark Drew Construction, Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE DC 81 - Bangor 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 3708 - CQ North John You 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE DC 14 - Brunswick 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.