Hose couplings, metal (except fluid power), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Dresser Natural Gas Solutions

Bradford, PA · ~191 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dresser Natural Gas Solutions runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hose couplings, metal (except fluid power), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Dresser Natural Gas Solutions: 3.0 TCR = 92% of Hose couplings, metal (except fluid power), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dresser Natural Gas Solutions safety composite

Dresser Natural Gas Solutions scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2019→2022

Dresser Natural Gas Solutions injury rate improved

Dresser Natural Gas Solutions's TCR fell 3.5 from 5.0 in 2019 to 1.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.0 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332919 · Bradford, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO C. Cowles & Company …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~191 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C. Cowles & Company & Subsidaries (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Dresser Natural Gas Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dresser Natural Gas Solutions averages 3.0 TCR (92% of the Hose couplings, metal (except fluid power), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dresser Natural Gas Solutions TCR series: 2019=5 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Dresser Natural Gas Solutions falls in its industry

100 Hose couplings, metal (except establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Hose couplings, metal (except employers in Pennsylvania.

Dresser Natural Gas Solutions (191 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Dresser Natural Gas Solutions
Dresser Natural Gas Solutions (191 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Dresser Natural Gas Solutions has more employees than the Hose couplings, metal (except fluid powe median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.6 1.6 3 0 0
2021 2.3 1.2 4 0 0
2020 3.3 2.7 6 0 0
2019 5.0 2.5 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332919 · PA · Bradford

100 Hose couplings, metal (except fluid power), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 40 employers in Bradford, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C. Cowles & Company & Subsidaries 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BBB 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Watts Water Technologies 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DERBYSHIRE MACHINE & TOOL 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Structural Services, Inc. 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knouse Foods Chambersburg 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Multi-Plastics Extrusions, Inc. Hazleton, PA. 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morgan Advanced Ceramics - Certech Inc. 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zippo Manufacturing Company 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bradford Regional Medical Center 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Refining Group- Bradford 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3514 293 FTE
NAT-TCR The Good Shepherd 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fresh Sausage Specialists 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sedona office 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Community Treatment, Inc. 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Nursing & Rehab 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innovative Injection Technologies 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE 001 Warehouse 191 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.