Coating metals and metal products for the trade · Wisconsin

DRM Electrocoat Corp

Reedsburg, WI · ~49 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DRM Electrocoat Corp runs at 421% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

DRM Electrocoat Corp: 13.9 TCR = 421% of Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DRM Electrocoat Corp safety composite

DRM Electrocoat Corp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

DRM Electrocoat Corp injury rate improved

DRM Electrocoat Corp's TCR fell 1.2 from 15.2 in 2016 to 14.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 26.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.2 · 2017=22.0 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=26.8 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=17.6 · 2024=14.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Reedsburg, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.9 · 421% of ind

  • DART 12.0 DART
  • RANK #52/56
  • PHOTO IHD Powdercoat Servi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IHD Powdercoat Services Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

DRM Electrocoat Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DRM Electrocoat Corp averages 13.9 TCR (421% of the Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DRM Electrocoat Corp TCR series: 2016=15.2 · 2017=22 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=26.8 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=4 · 2023=17.6 · 2024=14 · BLS 3.3

Where DRM Electrocoat Corp falls in its industry

646 Coating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 56 Coating metals and metal produ employers in Wisconsin.

DRM Electrocoat Corp (49 employees, TCR 13.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate DRM Electrocoat Corp
DRM Electrocoat Corp (49 employees, TCR 13.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

DRM Electrocoat Corp has fewer employees than the Coating metals and metal products for th median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.0 12.0 7 0 0
2023 17.6 11.7 9 0 0
2022 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2021 10.3 4.1 5 0 0
2020 26.8 14.6 11 0 0
2019 7.8 5.8 4 0 0
2018 7.3 1.8 4 0 0
2017 22.0 14.7 11 1 0
2016 15.2 9.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · WI · Reedsburg

646 Coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 30 employers in Reedsburg, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IHD Powdercoat Services Inc. 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Progressive Finishes, INC 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TWF Industries 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medicote 14.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE C Dairy LLC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frey Construction and Home Improvement, LLC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greater Fox Cities Area Habitat for Humanity, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Board Store Home Improvements, Inc. 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reedsburg 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reedsburg Area Medical Center Inc 607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grede 606 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seats Incorporated 530 FTE
NAT-TCR Classic Lawn & Landscape, INC. 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bracey's Supermarket Inc., Moosic 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NA-US-NV-Sparks-550 Milan Dr 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR R21 Telford PA 13.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elite Energy Services, LLC 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Don Luchetti Construction, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nordec Inc 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Restoration, Inc. 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.