Infrared sensors, solid-state, manufacturing · Texas

DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site

Dallas, TX · ~64 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Infrared sensors, solid-state, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Infrared sensors, solid-state, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site safety composite

DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site held a steady TCR band

DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334413 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/46
  • PHOTO LTD Material LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LTD Material LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Infrared sensors, solid-state, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site TCR series: 2016=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site falls in its industry

437 Infrared sensors, solid-state, establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 46 Infrared sensors, solid-state, employers in Texas.

DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site (64 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site
DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site (64 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9

DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC; Three Forest Site has fewer employees than the Infrared sensors, solid-state, manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334413 · TX · Dallas

437 Infrared sensors, solid-state, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LTD Material LLC 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Reading Corporate Office 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Remote Sites 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Solar Tempe Office 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mill Creek 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Palestine Hatchery 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE PILGRIMS MT. PLEASANT HACTCHERY 2 & 3 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE TGNR East Texas LLC 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbus Health and Rehab 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Portsmouth NNSY Commissary 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CA-Solmetric 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Doubletree Laurel 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE ORANGE PARK 357 College Dr 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-Swy 0035 1304 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-Swy 0035 1369 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.