Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing · Florida

DRS Technologies

Name: DRS Technologies Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Largo, FL · ~176 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DRS Technologies runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

DRS Technologies: 1.5 TCR = 47% of Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DRS Technologies safety composite

DRS Technologies scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers
DART rate: F 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DRS Technologies: 0.7 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.92× in 2018

DRS Technologies's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.7 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · Largo, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 47% of ind

DART 1.4 DART
RANK #5/7
PHOTO Eravant Amapola Faci…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 11 inj
SIZE ~176 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eravant Amapola Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.5
Eravant Amapol

1.5
Frequency Elec

1.5
QQE Summit LLC

1.5
API Technologi

1.5

What this shows DRS Technologies averages 1.5 TCR (47% of the Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing BLS benchmark).

DRS Technologies TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2018=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where DRS Technologies falls in its industry

334 Harness assemblies for electro establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Harness assemblies for electro employers in Florida.

DRS Technologies (176 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

DRS Technologies has more employees than the Harness assemblies for electronic use ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	2.4	1.4	10	0	0
2016	0.7	0.7	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · FL · Largo

334 Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 165 employers in Largo, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Eravant Amapola Facility	TORRANCE, CA	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Frequency Electronics Inc	UNIONDALE, NY	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	QQE Summit LLC	BEAVERCREEK, OH	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	API Technologies	STATE COLLEGE, PA	1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Quincy Farm	QUINCY	176 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Ally Building Solutions,LLC	ORLANDO	176 FTE
STATE-SIZE	DFA FLUID - ORLANDO FL	ORLANDO	176 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Jupiter Bach	PENSACOLA	176 FTE
CITY-NEAR	BayCare Home Care Medical Supply (7251)	Largo	1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR	HCA FLORIDA LARGO HOSPITAL	Largo	1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Largo Medical Center	Largo	1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Conmed - Largo	Largo	1,021 FTE
NAT-TCR	Bay Villa Healthcare Center	Bay City, TX	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	TQM Roofing, Inc.	Statesville, NC	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Child Support Enforcement	Greensboro, NC	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Saint-Gobain Ceramics	Latrobe, PA	1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Barbour Court Nursing and Rehabilitation	Smithfield, NC	176 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Garden Terrace Alzaheimers Center of Excellence	Aurora, CO	176 FTE
NAT-SIZE	PAM Specialty Hospital of Victoria North	Victoria, TX	176 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Republic National Distributing Company 8	Washington, DC	176 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.