Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing · Indiana

DuBose Strapping, Inc.

Crawfordsville, IN · ~45 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DuBose Strapping, Inc. runs at 476% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

DuBose Strapping, Inc.: 15.7 TCR = 476% of Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DuBose Strapping, Inc. safety composite

DuBose Strapping, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DuBose Strapping, Inc.: 13.8 → 28.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 28.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.45× in 2023

DuBose Strapping, Inc.'s TCR rose 14.7 from 13.8 in 2020 to 28.5 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Crawfordsville, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 476% of ind

  • DART 22.8 DART
  • RANK #42/42
  • PHOTO AMERISTEEL, INC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AMERISTEEL, INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

DuBose Strapping, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DuBose Strapping, Inc. averages 15.7 TCR (476% of the Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DuBose Strapping, Inc. TCR series: 2020=13.8 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=13.6 · 2023=28.5 · BLS 3.3

Where DuBose Strapping, Inc. falls in its industry

416 Steel mill products (e.g., bar establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 42 Steel mill products (e.g., bar employers in Indiana.

DuBose Strapping, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate DuBose Strapping, Inc.
DuBose Strapping, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

DuBose Strapping, Inc. has fewer employees than the Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, r median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 28.5 22.8 15 0 0
2022 13.6 13.6 6 0 0
2021 6.9 6.9 3 0 0
2020 13.8 6.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · IN · Crawfordsville

416 Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 66 employers in Crawfordsville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AMERISTEEL, INC 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR KWM, Inc. dba Stainless Structurals Works 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ameriti Manufacturing 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jersey Shore Steel Company (Rolling Division) 14.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE J Star Farms LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Windfall, IN 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Oil Field Services LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patoka Lake Regional Water & Sewer District 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSC Communications 986 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Book Company - Crawfordsville 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel-Indiana 765 FTE
NAT-TCR Willmar Middle School 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR North Georgia Truss Systems LLC 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Everett #104 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bear Paddle Swim School 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Channer Corporation 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capital One McLean 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Upper Midwest : SVC-Milwaukee WI-USA 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Mt. Hood 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.