Forms for poured concrete, erecting and dismantling · Missouri

Dun-Par Engineered Form Company

Kansas City, MO · ~72 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dun-Par Engineered Form Company runs at 503% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Forms for poured concrete, erecting and dismantling workplace, earning a grade F.

Dun-Par Engineered Form Company: 14.1 TCR = 503% of Forms for poured concrete, erecting and dismantling BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dun-Par Engineered Form Company safety composite

Dun-Par Engineered Form Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dun-Par Engineered Form Company: 11.4 → 16.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 18.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.14× in 2023

Dun-Par Engineered Form Company's TCR rose 4.6 from 11.4 in 2017 to 16.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 18.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238190 · Kansas City, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.1 · 503% of ind

  • DART 16.0 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Construction
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 67 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Construction (0.8 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Dun-Par Engineered Form Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dun-Par Engineered Form Company averages 14.1 TCR (503% of the Forms for poured concrete, erecting and dismantling BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dun-Par Engineered Form Company TCR series: 2017=11.4 · 2018=18.7 · 2019=18.5 · 2020=12.3 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=17 · 2023=16 · BLS 2.8

Where Dun-Par Engineered Form Company falls in its industry

166 Forms for poured concrete, ere establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Forms for poured concrete, ere employers in Missouri.

Dun-Par Engineered Form Company (72 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dun-Par Engineered Form Company
Dun-Par Engineered Form Company (72 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Dun-Par Engineered Form Company has more employees than the Forms for poured concrete, erecting and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 16.0 16.0 8 0 0
2022 17.0 14.2 6 0 0
2021 4.4 2.2 2 0 0
2020 12.3 7.6 13 0 0
2019 18.5 7.9 14 0 0
2018 18.7 12.9 16 0 0
2017 11.4 10.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238190 · MO · Kansas City

166 Forms for poured concrete, erecting and dismantling employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Construction 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jordison Construction, Inc 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beehaven Inc. 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fuse Fabrication, LLC 12.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mercury Communications Contractors, LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE MegaKC Corporation 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Karrenbrock Construction 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE St Louis Flour Mill 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR Marysville #008 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR West Valley #075 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Paramount Senior Living at Middleburg Heights 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cameron St. 14.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE KS Energy Services (Springfield) 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precast Services, Inc. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chrysalis 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZZ Galvanizing - Tulsa 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.