Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade · Massachusetts

Duncan Galvanizing Corp

Everett, MA · ~95 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Duncan Galvanizing Corp runs at 276% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Duncan Galvanizing Corp: 9.1 TCR = 276% of Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Duncan Galvanizing Corp safety composite

Duncan Galvanizing Corp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Duncan Galvanizing Corp injury rate improved

Duncan Galvanizing Corp's TCR fell 1.3 from 6.4 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=15.3 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Everett, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 276% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO EM Coating Services
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 71 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EM Coating Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Duncan Galvanizing Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Duncan Galvanizing Corp averages 9.1 TCR (276% of the Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Duncan Galvanizing Corp TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=15.3 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Duncan Galvanizing Corp falls in its industry

646 Hot dip galvanizing metals and establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Hot dip galvanizing metals and employers in Massachusetts.

Duncan Galvanizing Corp (95 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Duncan Galvanizing Corp
Duncan Galvanizing Corp (95 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Duncan Galvanizing Corp has more employees than the Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal pro median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 3.4 5 1 0
2023 8.5 6.8 8 2 0
2022 10.9 7.6 9 4 0
2021 15.3 10.2 13 5 0
2020 6.6 6.6 8 0 0
2019 7.2 4.8 9 0 0
2018 12.9 6.9 14 1 0
2016 6.4 4.6 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · MA · Everett

646 Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 36 employers in Everett, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EM Coating Services 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Extreme Coatings 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Coatings Inc. 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schofield Facility 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cranshaw Construction of New England 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baltazar Contractors 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE T.L. Edwards, Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE J H Lynch - Millbury 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wynn MA, LLC 3,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DBO1 634 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Now LLC - UMA4 302 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1229 - Everett 234 FTE
NAT-TCR Operations 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 034/Oklahoma Wesleyan University 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Boulevard Rehabilitation Center 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Yaffe Metals 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blue Grass Energy 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston TX 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gasbarre Products - Press Division 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Willows at Okemos 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.