Distribution of electric power · Pennsylvania

Duquesne Light Company

Pittsburgh, PA · ~1,818 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Duquesne Light Company runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade C.

Duquesne Light Company: 1.2 TCR = 99% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Duquesne Light Company safety composite

Duquesne Light Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Duquesne Light Company: 0.9 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2024

Duquesne Light Company's TCR rose 0.5 from 0.9 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 1.2 · 99% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #14/58
  • PHOTO Kenosha Racine
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 183 inj
  • SIZE ~1,818 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kenosha Racine (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Duquesne Light Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Duquesne Light Company averages 1.2 TCR (99% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Duquesne Light Company TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=1 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Duquesne Light Company falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 58 Distribution of electric power employers in Pennsylvania.

Duquesne Light Company (1,818 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Duquesne Light Company
Duquesne Light Company (1,818 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Duquesne Light Company has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.0 27 1 0
2023 1.1 0.6 19 1 0
2022 1.2 0.6 19 1 0
2021 1.2 0.6 20 3 0
2020 0.9 0.7 17 1 0
2019 1.8 0.8 31 3 0
2018 1.1 0.7 20 1 0
2017 1.0 0.7 17 0 0
2016 0.9 0.5 13 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · PA · Pittsburgh

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kenosha Racine 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coshocton Svc Ctr 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alamosa Service Center-805 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Utilities - Electric Division 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Einstein Medical Center Montgomery 1,817 FTE
STATE-SIZE A021 - Penn State Health Administrative Offices 1,813 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pfizer Collegeville 1,839 FTE
STATE-SIZE Procter and Gamble Mehoopany 1,793 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Fort Worth- Dry Bulk Transport 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Carl Belt Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR KKC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cameron Hill Bldg. 1-5, Garage - Shared Health 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE AMO Manufacturing INC 1,819 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - BFL2 1,819 FTE
NAT-SIZE FL_Riverview_4145 S Falkenburg Road_HB610112 1,819 FTE
NAT-SIZE UPR - Mayaguez Campus 1,817 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.