Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors · Georgia

Dustcom Limited, Inc

Garden City, GA · ~58 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dustcom Limited, Inc runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Dustcom Limited, Inc: 4.3 TCR = 155% of Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dustcom Limited, Inc safety composite

Dustcom Limited, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2019→2023

Dustcom Limited, Inc injury rate improved

Dustcom Limited, Inc's TCR fell 1.6 from 5.9 in 2019 to 4.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.9 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Garden City, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 155% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #34/42
  • PHOTO B.R. Kreider & Son, …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: B.R. Kreider & Son, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Dustcom Limited, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dustcom Limited, Inc averages 4.3 TCR (155% of the Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dustcom Limited, Inc TCR series: 2019=5.9 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=4.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Dustcom Limited, Inc falls in its industry

1,750 Excavating, earthmoving, or la establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 42 Excavating, earthmoving, or la employers in Georgia.

Dustcom Limited, Inc (58 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Dustcom Limited, Inc
Dustcom Limited, Inc (58 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Dustcom Limited, Inc has more employees than the Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.3 2.9 3 0 0
2022 3.1 1.5 2 0 1
2021 4.1 4.1 3 0 0
2020 4.4 2.9 3 0 0
2019 5.9 5.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · GA · Garden City

1,750 Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 46 employers in Garden City, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR B.R. Kreider & Son, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kozik Brothers Inc 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williamson 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Coast Drilling Company, Inc. 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Adel Hatchery 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chick Hatchery 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valdosta Operating/Fleet - 200 Miller Street Valdosta 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Rivers Energy an Electric Membership Corporation, Inc. 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gateway Terminals LLC 1,669 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ceres Savannah 1,081 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cal Cartage Warehousing & Transloading LLC-Hwy 25 & 307 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reeves Coastal Region 226 FTE
NAT-TCR Greif (IP Kernersville - Adhesives) 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Saratoga Spa & Bath, Inc 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt House Washington DC / The Wharf 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hendrick Medical Plaza 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store Construction & Maintenance 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross Plumbing 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Steel Erectors, Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mikron Industries 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.