Angle irons, metal, manufacturing · Nebraska

Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory)

Hastings, NE · ~172 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory) runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Angle irons, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory): 5.3 TCR = 160% of Angle irons, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory) safety composite

Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory): 4.1 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 6.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2021

Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory)'s TCR rose 0.7 from 4.1 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Hastings, NE ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 160% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #6/12
  • PHOTO S&H Industries, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~172 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S&H Industries, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory) averages 5.3 TCR (160% of the Angle irons, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory) TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory) falls in its industry

827 Angle irons, metal, manufactur establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 12 Angle irons, metal, manufactur employers in Nebraska.

Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory) (172 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory)
Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory) (172 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Dutton-Lainson Company (Factory) has more employees than the Angle irons, metal, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.8 3.0 8 0 0
2020 5.3 2.7 10 0 0
2019 5.8 4.2 11 0 0
2018 5.4 3.2 10 0 0
2017 6.4 3.5 11 0 0
2016 4.1 1.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · NE · Hastings

827 Angle irons, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 65 employers in Hastings, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S&H Industries, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richland Industries, LLC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Sales & Manufacturing, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colby Metal, Inc. 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Independent Investors, Inc. 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4322 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aureus Medical Management Services LLC 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSSI - 0112 JBS USA - Grand Island 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mary Lanning Memorial Hospital 1,197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transport Solutions Americas : MFG-Hastings, NE-USA 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Hastings, NE-USA 465 FTE
CITY-NEAR WR Reserve 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Crossett, Inc. - Tonawanda 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant #1 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sharp Transit LLC Mt. Juliet TN 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hawaiian Cement (Cement Division) 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alamp Concrete 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alpha Packaging, CLE 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Paul, MN 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waltco 172 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.