Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · District of Columbia

Dynamic Concepts inc.

Name: Dynamic Concepts inc. Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Washington, DC · ~155 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 1.7
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dynamic Concepts inc. runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Dynamic Concepts inc.: 1.7 TCR = 61% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dynamic Concepts inc. safety composite

Dynamic Concepts inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2020

Dynamic Concepts inc. injury rate improved

Dynamic Concepts inc.'s TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Washington, DC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 61% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #3/4
PHOTO Hot Line Constructio…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 9 inj
SIZE ~155 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hot Line Construction Brentwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.7
Hot Line Const

1.7
BMEI - Villa R

1.7
NA-US-NH-Manch

1.7
TESSCO Hobbs

1.7

What this shows Dynamic Concepts inc. averages 1.7 TCR (61% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Dynamic Concepts inc. TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Dynamic Concepts inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in District of Columbia.

Dynamic Concepts inc. (155 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Dynamic Concepts inc. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2020	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2016	3.4	3.0	9	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · DC · Washington

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Hot Line Construction Brentwood	BRENTWOOD, CA	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	BMEI - Villa Rica	VILLA RICA, GA	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	NA-US-NH-Manchester-Pepsi Road	MANCHESTER, NH	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	TESSCO Hobbs	HOBBS, NM	1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	10777 Walter Reed	WASHINGTON	155 FTE
STATE-SIZE	71068	WASHINGTON	155 FTE
STATE-SIZE	6921-00383	WASHINGTON	156 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Backcountry - DC	WASHINGTON	154 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Children's National Medical Center	Washington	7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Medstar Washington Hospital Center	Washington	7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Medstar Georgetown University Hospital	Washington	4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters	Washington	3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR	Nortek Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City, OK	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America, Inc.	Maysville, KY	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Custom Agri Systems - Napoleon	Napoleon, OH	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Evolent Health LLC Albuquerque	Albuquerque, NM	1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS) 064 Northern Region	Elk Grove, CA	155 FTE
NAT-SIZE	True Value Corsicana RDC	Corsicana, TX	155 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Lci - 057	Nampa, ID	155 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Raleigh Court Health and Rehabilitation Center	Roanoke, VA	155 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.