Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufacturing · Oregon
Dyno Nobel Inc.
Deer Island, OR · ~75 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.2
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Dyno Nobel Inc. runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.2
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 2
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Dyno Nobel Inc.'s OSHA Total Case Rate of 1.2 to the Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (35% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Dyno Nobel Inc.'s yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Dyno Nobel Inc. falls in its industry
95 Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous establishmentsSafer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.
Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous employers in Oregon.
Trend analysis for Dyno Nobel Inc.
Between 2023 and 2024, Dyno Nobel Inc.'s Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 1.2 to 1.2 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 1% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2023, at a TCR of 1.2, while 2024 saw the highest rate, at 1.2, a spread of 0.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Dyno Nobel Inc. recorded 2 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 2 injuries shown on this page for Dyno Nobel Inc. are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 325311 - Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 170,848 hours worked = 1.17 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Dyno Nobel Inc. (this establishment) | 1.17 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Nitrogenous fertilizer materials manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 325311 |
| Oregon state avg (all industries) | 6.16 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Dyno Nobel Inc. to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Dyno Nobel Inc.'s reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufacturing peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 35% of the Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufacturing benchmark, Dyno Nobel Inc. reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Dyno Nobel Inc.'s safety grade?
How many injuries has Dyno Nobel Inc. reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Oregon, and by nearby establishments in Deer Island - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~1.2)
Similar size (~75 workers)
Nearby in Deer Island
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.