Panel, metal, installation · Minnesota

E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company

Minneapolis, MN · ~42 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Panel, metal, installation workplace, earning a grade F.

E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company: 6.8 TCR = 245% of Panel, metal, installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company safety composite

E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2020→2024

E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company injury rate improved

E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.4 · 2022=12.5 · 2023=12.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238390 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 245% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/17
  • PHOTO The Agents Companies
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Agents Companies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company averages 6.8 TCR (245% of the Panel, metal, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company TCR series: 2020=2.4 · 2022=12.5 · 2023=12.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company falls in its industry

403 Panel, metal, installation establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 17 Panel, metal, installation employers in Minnesota.

E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company (42 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company
E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company (42 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.1

E-Loc Corporation DBA Twin Cities Closet Company has fewer employees than the Panel, metal, installation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 12.5 5.0 5 0 0
2022 12.5 0.0 6 0 0
2020 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238390 · MN · Minneapolis

403 Panel, metal, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Agents Companies 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NPW Contracting, Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ortronics, Inc 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ace Door & Window 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michael Foods Inc.- GY2 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Falls, MN-PS 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willmar Municipal Utilities 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benson Power, LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR EnCon Colorado LLC 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Madison House 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Manor of Houma 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR BJ Industries, Inc. 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vermeer North Atlantic Sales & Service 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Tarrier steel company 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Girbau North America 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schiff Farms Inc 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.