Radio transmitting tower construction · Florida

E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc.

Tampa, FL · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc. runs at 178% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Radio transmitting tower construction workplace, earning a grade D.

E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc.: 5.0 TCR = 178% of Radio transmitting tower construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc. safety composite

E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc.: 3.3 → 6.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.3 from 3.3 in 2023 to 6.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Tampa, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 178% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #82/98
  • PHOTO HI TECH UTILITY CONS…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HI TECH UTILITY CONSTRUCTION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc. averages 5.0 TCR (178% of the Radio transmitting tower construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc. TCR series: 2023=3.3 · 2024=6.6 · BLS 2.8

Where E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Radio transmitting tower const establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 98 Radio transmitting tower const employers in Florida.

E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc.
E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

E. M. Enterprises General Contractors, Inc. has fewer employees than the Radio transmitting tower construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.6 0.0 2 0 0
2023 3.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · FL · Tampa

1,605 Radio transmitting tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HI TECH UTILITY CONSTRUCTION 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Electric Service, Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-MA-Wilmington- Research Drive 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SC503 - Bristol 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Yee Farms Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE OZBLU USA LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE POK-Okeechobee Clean Energy Center 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant City Office 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Pinnacle Dairy LLC 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Union Industrial Contractors 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Vegetable Growers Supply 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mark Rite Lines Equipment Company 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sewer 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE GRE-CPIS-GREENVILLE,SC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE CLS-CPIS-CHARLESTON,SC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glenroy Construction Co. Inc. 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.