Apartment building rental or leasing · California

E & S Ring Management Corporate Office

Los Angeles, CA · ~52 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E & S Ring Management Corporate Office runs at 252% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Apartment building rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade F.

E & S Ring Management Corporate Office: 3.5 TCR = 252% of Apartment building rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E & S Ring Management Corporate Office safety composite

E & S Ring Management Corporate Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2020→2024

E & S Ring Management Corporate Office injury rate improved

E & S Ring Management Corporate Office's TCR fell 2.6 from 4.9 in 2020 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.9 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.5 · 252% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/113
  • PHOTO Gorman Management Co…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gorman Management Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

E & S Ring Management Corporate Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E & S Ring Management Corporate Office averages 3.5 TCR (252% of the Apartment building rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E & S Ring Management Corporate Office TCR series: 2020=4.9 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 1.4

Where E & S Ring Management Corporate Office falls in its industry

1,100 Apartment building rental or l establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 113 Apartment building rental or l employers in California.

E & S Ring Management Corporate Office (52 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate E & S Ring Management Corporate Office
E & S Ring Management Corporate Office (52 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

E & S Ring Management Corporate Office has more employees than the Apartment building rental or leasing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 5.6 2.8 1 1 0
2021 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 4.9 2.4 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · CA · Los Angeles

1,100 Apartment building rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gorman Management Company 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bay View 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Biltmore Properties Inc 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Del Tura 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phil Foster Ranch 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Ivanhoe 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brassfield Estate Vineyard 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Kosmo Machine Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Design Mechanical 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 10135 P Street 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1337 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE GMS Conley 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schnell Contracting Limited LLC 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lawn and Tree Services 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tillamook 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.