Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

Eagles Landing Senior Living

Stockbridge, GA · ~56 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eagles Landing Senior Living runs at 464% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Eagles Landing Senior Living: 17.6 TCR = 464% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eagles Landing Senior Living safety composite

Eagles Landing Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 33.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−77.2

2017→2020

Eagles Landing Senior Living injury rate improved

Eagles Landing Senior Living's TCR fell 77.2 from 110.5 in 2017 to 33.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 110.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=110.5 · 2018=2.1 · 2020=33.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Stockbridge, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.6 · 464% of ind

  • DART 33.2 DART
  • RANK #188/205
  • PHOTO ArdenWoods Retiremen…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ArdenWoods Retirement Community (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Eagles Landing Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eagles Landing Senior Living averages 17.6 TCR (464% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eagles Landing Senior Living TCR series: 2017=110.5 · 2018=2.1 · 2020=33.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Eagles Landing Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #188 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Eagles Landing Senior Living (56 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Eagles Landing Senior Living
Eagles Landing Senior Living (56 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Eagles Landing Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 33.2 33.2 0 13 0
2018 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 110.5 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Stockbridge

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 62 employers in Stockbridge, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ArdenWoods Retirement Community 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Wilmette 17.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bluffs at Hamilton Hill 17.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apple Springs Assisted Living 17.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Live Production Offices 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shimizu North America LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE T D Farrell 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE LRA Constructors, Inc. 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Henry Hospital 1,767 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3402 423 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3402 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 745 345 FTE
NAT-TCR Abington Crest Healthcare and Rehabilitation 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence at Quarry Hill 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR QNT - Belton 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 222 Val1000 17.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Catano, Puerto Rico - Replenishment Cntr 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mt. Pocono Distribution Center - ABARTA Coca-Cola Beverages 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beech Grove (BP) 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE UHA Chestnut Ridge Center 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.