Hydroseeding services (e.g., decorative, erosion control purposes) · Indiana

Earth Images, Inc.

Indianapolis, IN · ~44 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Earth Images, Inc. runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hydroseeding services (e.g., decorative, erosion control purposes) workplace, earning a grade C.

Earth Images, Inc.: 4.2 TCR = 92% of Hydroseeding services (e.g., decorative, erosion control purposes) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Earth Images, Inc. safety composite

Earth Images, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2020→2024

Earth Images, Inc. injury rate improved

Earth Images, Inc.'s TCR fell 7.7 from 7.7 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=7.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 92% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/50
  • PHOTO JML LANDSCAPE MANAGE…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JML LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Earth Images, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Earth Images, Inc. averages 4.2 TCR (92% of the Hydroseeding services (e.g., decorative, erosion control purposes) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Earth Images, Inc. TCR series: 2020=7.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Earth Images, Inc. falls in its industry

2,875 Hydroseeding services (e.g., d establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 50 Hydroseeding services (e.g., d employers in Indiana.

Earth Images, Inc. (44 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Earth Images, Inc.
Earth Images, Inc. (44 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Earth Images, Inc. has fewer employees than the Hydroseeding services (e.g., decorative, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 10.3 10.3 4 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.7 7.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · IN · Indianapolis

2,875 Hydroseeding services (e.g., decorative, erosion control purposes) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JML LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT LLC 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5767 - Tampa West 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Landscape Management of Coastal Carolina 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR sl acquisition company, llc dba superior landscapes 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2307-Whitestown, IN (Monsanto Co.) 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE RushShelby Energy 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE OCM Engineering, LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Power Inc-IN-Rolling Prairie 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Silvertip 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Darling Ingredients-Tacoma 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 583009-Lakeland | WI | DYL-350 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 533010-Little Elm | TX | TEX-750 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Rheinmetall Systems 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE DEG Enterprises Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE AgBiTech 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electrical Repair Service Co. 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.