Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified; Blood Bank · Alabama

East Alabama Region

Opelika, AL · ~22 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

East Alabama Region runs at 319% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified; Blood Bank workplace, earning a grade F.

East Alabama Region: 12.1 TCR = 319% of Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified; Blood Bank BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

East Alabama Region safety composite

East Alabama Region scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

East Alabama Region: 4.5 → 10.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 42.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

East Alabama Region's TCR rose 5.6 from 4.5 in 2016 to 10.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 42.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621991 · Opelika, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.1 · 319% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/36
  • PHOTO Austin-Slaughter, TX…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Austin-Slaughter, TX Biomat (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

East Alabama Region in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows East Alabama Region averages 12.1 TCR (319% of the Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified; Blood Bank BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

East Alabama Region TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=42.5 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=11.4 · 2022=15.5 · 2023=9.1 · 2024=10 · BLS 3.8

Where East Alabama Region falls in its industry

1,713 Health and Allied Services, No establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 36 Health and Allied Services, No employers in Alabama.

East Alabama Region (22 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate East Alabama Region
East Alabama Region (22 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3

East Alabama Region has fewer employees than the Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewher median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.0 0.0 2 0 0
2023 9.1 4.5 2 0 0
2022 15.5 5.2 3 0 0
2021 11.4 11.4 0 2 0
2020 5.6 5.6 1 0 0
2019 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2018 42.5 28.3 5 4 0
2017 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2016 4.5 4.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621991 · AL · Opelika

1,713 Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified; Blood Bank employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 87 employers in Opelika, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Austin-Slaughter, TX Biomat 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NuPlasma 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lewiston-Main, ME - Biomat 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Casper, WY-BioLife 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Breeder/Broiler 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Live Haul Gadsden Alabama 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE M.A.D.H. GIN, INC. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Logan Martin Dam 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6095 849 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6095 843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mando America Corporation 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanwha Advanced Materials America LLC. Opelika 470 FTE
NAT-TCR Naperville Outlet #117 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Forest Parkway 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnstown Med-Van Transport Office 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0246 San Ramon 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store #7 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #56 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Holland 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE HCC-INDIANAPOLIS 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.