Concrete breaking and cutting for demolition · Maryland

East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc.

Jessup, MD · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc. runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Concrete breaking and cutting for demolition workplace, earning a grade D.

East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc.: 4.5 TCR = 161% of Concrete breaking and cutting for demolition BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc. safety composite

East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2018→2024

East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc. injury rate improved

East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.0 from 6.7 in 2018 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.7 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Jessup, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 161% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/34
  • PHOTO Benton's Sand & Grav…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Benton's Sand & Gravel, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc. averages 4.5 TCR (161% of the Concrete breaking and cutting for demolition BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc. TCR series: 2018=6.7 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 2.8

Where East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc. falls in its industry

1,750 Concrete breaking and cutting establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 34 Concrete breaking and cutting employers in Maryland.

East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc.
East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

East Coast Concrete Specialties, Inc. has fewer employees than the Concrete breaking and cutting for demoli median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2018 6.7 2.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · MD · Jessup

1,750 Concrete breaking and cutting for demolition employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 122 employers in Jessup, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Benton's Sand & Gravel, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR R.E. Arnold Construction, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joe Bandy & Son, Inc. 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE FOXBOROUGH NURSERY, INC. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE WGL MD - Frederick 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2017116 - Purple Line OMF 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE FMS Construction - Maryland 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster Foods 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jessup Correctional Institution 530 FTE
CITY-NEAR RNDC Jessup 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Baltimore, LLC 491 FTE
NAT-TCR HQC Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Chopper #200 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Paragon Services, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkview Dairy 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Weaver Bros., Inc. Kenai Terminal 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Costa Mesa - Brookfield Properties Development LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dino's Masonry, Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boyden 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.