Hardwood dimension lumber and stock, resawing purchased lumber · Pennsylvania

East Earl

East Earl, PA · ~651 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

East Earl runs at 239% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hardwood dimension lumber and stock, resawing purchased lumber workplace, earning a grade F.

East Earl: 7.9 TCR = 239% of Hardwood dimension lumber and stock, resawing purchased lumber BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

East Earl safety composite

East Earl scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

East Earl: 6.3 → 11.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2024

East Earl's TCR rose 5.5 from 6.3 in 2016 to 11.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321912 · East Earl, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 239% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #11/14
  • PHOTO Hughes Hardwood Inte…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 345 inj
  • SIZE ~651 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hughes Hardwood International Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

East Earl in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows East Earl averages 7.9 TCR (239% of the Hardwood dimension lumber and stock, resawing purchased lumber BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

East Earl TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=10 · 2023=7.5 · 2024=11.8 · BLS 3.3

Where East Earl falls in its industry

178 Hardwood dimension lumber and establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 14 Hardwood dimension lumber and employers in Pennsylvania.

East Earl (651 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate East Earl
East Earl (651 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1

East Earl has more employees than the Hardwood dimension lumber and stock, res median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.8 5.5 42 29 0
2023 7.5 4.3 30 17 0
2022 10.0 5.8 45 22 0
2021 5.6 4.4 38 0 0
2020 6.2 2.9 27 14 0
2019 6.6 5.6 45 1 0
2018 9.2 4.8 46 17 0
2017 7.9 4.8 38 15 0
2016 6.3 4.5 34 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321912 · PA · East Earl

178 Hardwood dimension lumber and stock, resawing purchased lumber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 18 employers in East Earl, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hughes Hardwood International Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nelson Wood Shims 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Valley Cutstock, Inc. 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Idaho Timber of Boise 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pixelle Specialty Solutions 651 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cabinetworks Group 651 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thermo Fisher Scientific-FCS Allentown, PA 651 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sacred Heart Hospital 651 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shady Maple Smorgasbord 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shady Maple Farm Market 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meridian Products LLC 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR Herman R. Ewell, Inc. 132 FTE
NAT-TCR Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 026/Chowan University 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Zucker Hillside Hospital 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Clare Hospital - Fenton 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR East Hartford 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Skyworks Solutions, Inc. - Newbury Park, CA 651 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anheuser-Busch, LLC Los Angeles Brewery 651 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cold Spring Granite Company 651 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sysco Houston Inc. 651 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.