Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) · Florida

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill

Panama City, FL · ~557 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) workplace, earning a grade C.

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill: 3.2 TCR = 96% of Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill safety composite

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill held a steady TCR band

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.4 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=5.0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336611 · Panama City, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #19/47
  • PHOTO Omega Shipyard
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 190 inj
  • SIZE ~557 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Omega Shipyard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill averages 3.2 TCR (96% of the Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=5 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill falls in its industry

454 Shipyard (i.e., facility capab establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 47 Shipyard (i.e., facility capab employers in Florida.

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill (557 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill
Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill (557 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson/Mill has more employees than the Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of buil median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.5 1.9 42 0 0
2019 1.5 1.1 14 0 0
2018 2.5 1.4 18 0 0
2017 5.0 2.8 49 2 0
2016 3.4 1.8 67 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336611 · FL · Panama City

454 Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 180 employers in Panama City, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Omega Shipyard 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vigor Marine Seattle 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR L3 Unidyne Princess Anne 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR T. T. Coatings Inc. Mile marker 104 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sparton DeLeon Springs 557 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advance Auto Parts DC 29 557 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulfstream 556 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loews Portofino Bay Hotel 556 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Shipbuilding Group Nelson 1,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : MFG-Lynn Haven, FL-USA 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLPEN89 ASCENSION SACRED HEART BAY HOSP 893 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulf Coast Regional Medical Center 879 FTE
NAT-TCR Conbraco Industries - Conway 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosenblum Cellars 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR East Plant 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR WHI Cleveland East Management LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE PA - Zara 557 FTE
NAT-SIZE Randstad Corporate 557 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leprino Foods Company, Denver 557 FTE
NAT-SIZE BP Exploration Alaska, Inc., - Anchorage Campus 557 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.