Cellulosic fibers and filaments manufacturing · Tennessee

Eastman Kingsport Site

Kingsport, TN · ~7,258 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eastman Kingsport Site runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cellulosic fibers and filaments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Eastman Kingsport Site: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Cellulosic fibers and filaments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eastman Kingsport Site safety composite

Eastman Kingsport Site scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Eastman Kingsport Site held a steady TCR band

Eastman Kingsport Site's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.7 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.7 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325220 · Kingsport, TN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO DSM Protective Mater…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 381 inj
  • SIZE ~7,258 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DSM Protective Materials (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Eastman Kingsport Site in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eastman Kingsport Site averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Cellulosic fibers and filaments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Eastman Kingsport Site TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Eastman Kingsport Site falls in its industry

68 Cellulosic fibers and filament establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Cellulosic fibers and filament employers in Tennessee.

Eastman Kingsport Site (7,258 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 167 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eastman Kingsport Site
Eastman Kingsport Site (7,258 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 167 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Eastman Kingsport Site has more employees than the Cellulosic fibers and filaments manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.3 24 0 0
2023 0.4 0.3 29 0 0
2022 0.8 0.6 52 2 0
2021 0.9 0.8 48 7 0
2020 0.8 0.8 42 12 0
2019 0.8 0.7 55 0 0
2018 0.7 0.6 48 1 0
2017 0.7 0.4 38 5 0
2016 0.7 0.6 45 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325220 · TN · Kingsport

68 Cellulosic fibers and filaments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 152 employers in Kingsport, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DSM Protective Materials 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toho Tenax America, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Invista MHE LO2 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DuPont Spruance Plant 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE USXpress 7,385 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLEVELAND PACKERS 6,804 FTE
STATE-SIZE EMC 6,606 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCT Childrens ER 6,606 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holston Valley Medical Center 1,733 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Chemical Company Kinsport TN- BSL 1,206 FTE
CITY-NEAR BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - VA 1,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - TN 1,073 FTE
NAT-TCR Cust-O-Fab Sand Springs 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR White Mountain Imaging - Concord NH 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Scentsy Meridian Temps 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lebeda Mattress, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Univeristy of Nevada, Reno 7,263 FTE
NAT-SIZE UVA Medical Center 7,268 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue 7,272 FTE
NAT-SIZE UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.