Long-distance telephone carriers, wired · Louisiana

EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber

Gonzales, LA · ~39 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber runs at 2281% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Long-distance telephone carriers, wired workplace, earning a grade F.

EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber: 16.0 TCR = 2281% of Long-distance telephone carriers, wired BLS 0.7 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber safety composite

EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.5

2016→2020

EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber injury rate improved

EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber's TCR fell 18.5 from 23.2 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 27.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=23.2 · 2017=27.9 · 2018=16.1 · 2019=7.9 · 2020=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Gonzales, LA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.0 · 2281% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Valdez
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Valdez (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber averages 16.0 TCR (2281% of the Long-distance telephone carriers, wired BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber TCR series: 2016=23.2 · 2017=27.9 · 2018=16.1 · 2019=7.9 · 2020=4.7 · BLS 0.7

Where EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber falls in its industry

537 Long-distance telephone carrie establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Long-distance telephone carrie employers in Louisiana.

EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber (39 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber
EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber (39 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

EATELCORP - Installation/Repair Lab & Fiber has fewer employees than the Long-distance telephone carriers, wired median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2019 7.9 5.2 3 0 0
2018 16.1 3.2 5 0 0
2017 27.9 9.3 6 3 0
2016 23.2 6.3 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · LA · Gonzales

537 Long-distance telephone carriers, wired employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 91 employers in Gonzales, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Valdez 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Camuy Hatillo CO 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Aguadilla Centro Operaciones / Cuesta Vieja 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Modulos Humacao y CO 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Entergy Little Gypsy 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coughlin Power Station 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acadia Power Station 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4375-XOM Baton Rouge 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Specialty Welding and Turnarounds, LLC 2,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR 532 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smith Tank & Steel, Inc. 450 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 532 435 FTE
NAT-TCR Service 5212 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZMAC 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hobbs Center (Nmhob) 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR APX Industrial Coatings 16.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 69 Yuba City 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Praxair Distribution Inc. Wilmington 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suit-Kote Construction 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE 111 North College 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.