Belt conveyor systems manufacturing · Michigan

Eckhart Advanced Technology Center

Warren, MI · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eckhart Advanced Technology Center runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Belt conveyor systems manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Eckhart Advanced Technology Center: 6.1 TCR = 184% of Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eckhart Advanced Technology Center safety composite

Eckhart Advanced Technology Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Eckhart Advanced Technology Center: 3.0 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Eckhart Advanced Technology Center's TCR rose 2.0 from 3.0 in 2019 to 5.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333922 · Warren, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 184% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #35/53
  • PHOTO Automated Conveyor S…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Automated Conveyor Systems Incorporated (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Eckhart Advanced Technology Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eckhart Advanced Technology Center averages 6.1 TCR (184% of the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eckhart Advanced Technology Center TCR series: 2019=3 · 2020=10.2 · 2021=5 · BLS 3.3

Where Eckhart Advanced Technology Center falls in its industry

361 Belt conveyor systems manufact establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 53 Belt conveyor systems manufact employers in Michigan.

Eckhart Advanced Technology Center (30 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Eckhart Advanced Technology Center
Eckhart Advanced Technology Center (30 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Eckhart Advanced Technology Center has fewer employees than the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 10.2 10.2 2 0 0
2019 3.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333922 · MI · Warren

361 Belt conveyor systems manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 290 employers in Warren, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Automated Conveyor Systems Incorporated 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Titan Industries Inc 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Conveyor Supply Company - Pleasant Prairie 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bryant Products, Inc 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kitchen Farms, Inc. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Revolution Farms 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE TES Filer City Station 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Fermi II Nuclear Power Plant Project 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren Technical Center 22,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Global Technical Center 21,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren Truck Assembly Plant 3,804 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET153 1,903 FTE
NAT-TCR North Texas Healthcare Laundry 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Terminal 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Connecticut Coining, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PACCAR Parts - Rockford 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Super Save 479 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Overhead Door Company of Burlington #348 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Days Inn Connecticut Avenue 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Drury Inn & Suites - St. Louis Southwest 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.