Residential construction, single-family, general contractors · Washington

Eco Electric and Pluming Office

Seattle, WA · ~40 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eco Electric and Pluming Office runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Residential construction, single-family, general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Eco Electric and Pluming Office: 5.0 TCR = 132% of Residential construction, single-family, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eco Electric and Pluming Office safety composite

Eco Electric and Pluming Office scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2021→2024

Eco Electric and Pluming Office injury rate improved

Eco Electric and Pluming Office's TCR fell 2.4 from 7.3 in 2021 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=7.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 132% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #24/56
  • PHOTO CSP-DWH-COLORADO SPR…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CSP-DWH-COLORADO SPRINGS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Eco Electric and Pluming Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eco Electric and Pluming Office averages 5.0 TCR (132% of the Residential construction, single-family, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eco Electric and Pluming Office TCR series: 2021=7.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Eco Electric and Pluming Office falls in its industry

976 Residential construction, sing establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 56 Residential construction, sing employers in Washington.

Eco Electric and Pluming Office (40 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Eco Electric and Pluming Office
Eco Electric and Pluming Office (40 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Eco Electric and Pluming Office has fewer employees than the Residential construction, single-family, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2023 4.9 2.5 2 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2021 7.3 7.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · WA · Seattle

976 Residential construction, single-family, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CSP-DWH-COLORADO SPRINGS 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JSH & Sons, LLC 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reilly Painting & Contracting Inc 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal West Drywall Inc 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Enterprise 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSE, KSP - Kitsap Service Center 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wood Solutions 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Bath Vancouver Call Center 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Joby Aviation Marina 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Colony Court Come Home 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Embassy Suites Kennesaw 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Iowa Steel & Wire Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glen W. Gilbert 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE JACKSON 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE QSI Orland 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foreman Pro Cleaning, LLC 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.