Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors · Arizona

EcoDry Restoration of Arizona

Gilbert, AZ · ~154 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EcoDry Restoration of Arizona runs at 441% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

EcoDry Restoration of Arizona: 16.8 TCR = 441% of Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EcoDry Restoration of Arizona safety composite

EcoDry Restoration of Arizona scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2019→2020

EcoDry Restoration of Arizona injury rate improved

EcoDry Restoration of Arizona's TCR fell 0.5 from 17.0 in 2019 to 16.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 17.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=17.0 · 2020=16.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Gilbert, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 16.8 · 441% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #17/19
  • PHOTO 20-TURABO HEIGHTS
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 20-TURABO HEIGHTS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

EcoDry Restoration of Arizona in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EcoDry Restoration of Arizona averages 16.8 TCR (441% of the Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

EcoDry Restoration of Arizona TCR series: 2019=17 · 2020=16.5 · BLS 3.8

Where EcoDry Restoration of Arizona falls in its industry

698 Fire and flood restoration, si establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 19 Fire and flood restoration, si employers in Arizona.

EcoDry Restoration of Arizona (154 employees, TCR 16.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate EcoDry Restoration of Arizona
EcoDry Restoration of Arizona (154 employees, TCR 16.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

EcoDry Restoration of Arizona has more employees than the Fire and flood restoration, single-famil median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 16.5 6.6 7 3 0
2019 17.0 4.9 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · AZ · Gilbert

698 Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 261 employers in Gilbert, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 20-TURABO HEIGHTS 16.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hawkins Cleaning Services, Inc dba ServiceMaster of Central Illinois 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 24-BRISAS DE CAYEY 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LeafGuard Chicago 16.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 849 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE SimonMed-Estrella 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advanced Construction Southwest of California, Inc 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Foods, Inc. 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030512 1,613 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Gilbert 1,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030512-512001 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-512 911 FTE
NAT-TCR 20-Turabo Heights 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gladwin Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Area - Morton 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 2059 16.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seaboard Lumber Mill 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meridian Air Charter 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edina ISD #273 Highlands Elementary 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kandiyohi County Public Works 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.